Heat Pipes – Wick Structures, Performance & Shapes
Celsia manufactures heat pipes in all shapes, sizes, and performance characteristics for use in its custom heat sink designs. Their high thermal conductivity, the ease with which they can be bent and shaped, and their exceedingly long life make them an ideal upgrade to solid metal heat sinks or, in some cases, an alternative to pumped liquid cooling systems.
Heat Pipe Wick Structure
Heat pipes are comprised of a case (a sealed pipe), a working fluid (usually water) which changes state from liquid to vapor, and a wick structure which moves the liquid from the fin stack (condenser) to the heat source (evaporator). There are three commonly used wick structures, each with unique cost and performance characteristics. Ordered from highest to lowest by cost, performance, and ability to work against gravity they are: sintered powder wick, screen mesh wick, and grooved wick.
Heat Pipe Performance
More commonly known as Qmax, the maximum heat carrying capacity of heat pipes generally increases with the diameter of the pipe. However, each wick type can be tuned to optimize specific performance parameters and this is especially true of sintered wicks.
For example, the chart below graphs Qmax for typical sintered wick heat pipes of varying diameters against the orientation in which the pipe is required to operate. The grey line represents a10mm pipe designed to maximize Qmax when flat (0-degree orientation). Like all heat pipes the Qmax increases as the evaporator is moved below the condenser. The opposite is also true and there can be as much as a 95% drop in Qmax from one orientation extreme to the next. However, the internal structure – wick thickness, wick porosity, and amount of working fluid – can be changed to optimize for specific conditions
If the engineer knows that the heat pipe will be required to operate in orientations between -50 to -90 degrees, the wick structure can be optimized to increase the capillary pumping action. As seen the chart below, a gravity optimized 6mm heat pipe now has a higher Qmax, than its non-optimized 6mm counterpart, to meet the needs of this application. The trade-off? Its Qmax is lower than the non-gravity optimized 6mm pipe in orientations above -45 degrees.
Heat Pipe Shapes
Heat pipes can be made into virtually any shape by bending and/or flattening them; subject to certain parameters. The typical minimum bend radius of a heat pipe is 3-times the diameter of the tube. However, bending will reduce its Qmax, the maximum power transport capacity. Smooth, gradual bends will have less of an effect than tight ones, but a good rule of thumb is for every 45-degree bend Qmax will decrease by 2.5%. Please contact Celsia firstname.lastname@example.org for detailed information regarding your application.
Flattening a heat pipe to one-third of its original diameter is generally considered the maximum, although this figure decrease with smaller heat pipes (2-4mm) and increases with larger ones (>10mm). Heat pipe performance can be affected as the tube is flattened. However, this is not always the case
The chart below offers some insight into how flattening affects heat pipe performance. Provided a heat pipe is properly matched to the application, its Qmax is determined by the lower of the wick limit or the vapor limit. For instance, for a round 6mm standard heat pipe the wick limit (black dotted line) is just under 60 watts. Flattening it to 4, 3.5, or 3mm has no effect on its Qmax as the vapor limit is above the wick limit. Note that flattening a round 8 or 10mm heat pipe to 3mm or 2.5mm will have a substantial effect on its Qmax.
These numbers are based on typical designs. Other designs may be able to be thinner while “performance” designs may require additional thickness.
Heat Pipe Effective Thermal Conductivity
Knowing the effective conductivity of a heat pipe or vapor chambers is important when performing CFD modeling of two-phase devices which are integrated into a thermal solution.
Regularly published heat pipe thermal conductivities range from 5,000 to 100,000 W/m-K. That’s up to about 250 times that of solid copper and 500 times that of solid aluminum. However, engineers should confirm the conductivity numbers for their specific application Unlike solid metal, the effective thermal conductivity of heat pipes varies tremendously.
Two-phase device performance varies with a number of factors including temperature and power densities the effective conductivity of these devices is a snapshot of operation at a given operating condition. This is typically done at the worst case condition for the device. The effective conductivity numbers are derived from a calculated delta-t factored with the power (Q), the cross-sectional area (A) and the length the heat is being moved (L). Length is the dominant factor in conductivity calculations.
The figure below illustrates the effect of length on heat pipe thermal conductivity. In this example, we used three (6mm) heat pipes to transport heat from a
Recommended Blog Posts
Now that we’ve determined which heat pipes can effectively carry the required heat load (Pt 1), we need to ensure we select and size the heat exchanger to dissipate the heat into the surrounding air -based on available air flow. As mentioned in the prior post, this...
I’m often asked which two-phase cooling technology, heat pipes or vapor chambers, is best suited for a particular electronics application. While there are some good rules of thumb the answer isn’t always simple. Nonetheless, this blog post will cover the...
The majority of applications for heat pipes, and to a lesser extent vapor chambers, require these products to be bent. Below are respective examples for high-performance graphics card, semiconductor equipment and networking applications. But what effect does...
At some point in a thermal system design project it may become apparent that the tried and true methods of increasing thermal efficiency - solid base, fin & fan - just aren’t sufficient. Reasons include: Keep out zones prohibit a larger heat sink (thicker...